How Much Protein Do You Really Need? The Science Behind Daily Protein Intake

Let's cut through the protein propaganda. Walk into any gym, scroll through fitness social media, or chat with your workout buddy, and you'll hear wildly different numbers thrown around about daily protein intake. Some claim you can only absorb 25 grams at a time. Others insist you need 2+ grams per pound of bodyweight. Meanwhile, your grandmother is thriving on 50 grams a day while doing her morning walks.

So what's the real story? Like most things in fitness, the truth is more nuanced than the extremes suggest, but thankfully, it's also simpler than the industry wants you to believe.

The Myth That Won't Die: The 25-Gram Protein Limit

One of the most persistent protein myths is that your body can only absorb 20-25 grams of protein at once, forcing you to eat small amounts every 2-3 hours or risk "wasting" your precious protein powder.

This myth stems from a single 2013 study where researchers fed participants 20 grams of protein four times per day versus larger, less frequent doses. The smaller, frequent doses won, and the fitness world ran with it. But here's what they didn't tell you: both groups consumed far less protein than current recommendations, and the researchers used whey protein a rapidly absorbed source that quickly saturates intestinal receptors.

When eating slower absorbing protein sources, such as those that come in a varied diet of meats, eggs, beans, dairy, and plant-based protein, the 25-gram limit does not seem to apply. Your body is remarkably efficient at extracting nutrients from whole foods consumed in normal meal patterns.

The real takeaway? Stop stressing about protein timing and focus on total daily intake. Your body didn't evolve to require protein shakes every three hours.

What Does the Science Actually Say?

The baseline recommendation from the National Institutes of Health is laughably low at 0.36 grams per pound of bodyweight daily. This recommendation came from a study done decades ago on 25-year-old healthy, active men. And that study looked at how much protein the men needed to stay in nitrogen balance....essentially, the bare minimum to not lose muscle mass.

This isn't a target; it's survival mode.

“The problem is that the RDA is insufficient to meet the needs of a substantial proportion of the general population, and it comes up short for practically all dieting and athletic populations.”- Alan Aragon

For people who actually want to thrive, not just survive, the research is clear. Experts in sports nutrition and exercise physiology are mostly in agreement that individuals should aim to consume about 1.6-2.2 grams per kilogram per day of protein to maximize muscle protein synthesis. In practical terms, this translates to roughly 0.7-1.0 grams per pound of bodyweight.

If you're eating 1 gram per pound of your body weight, you're getting 95 plus percent of the protein's benefits. Going beyond this offers diminishing returns for most people.

The RDA also fails to consider other common cases where protein requirements increase, such as during pregnancy, breastfeeding, childhood development, or recovery from injury or illness, let alone the added protein needs of those who engage in regular resistance training. In other words, the RDA is adequate for the body’s functional basic needs if you are a diminutive, fairly sedentary, young adult in otherwise good health who is not attempting to add muscle to your frame. If you don’t fall into that group, good luck… - Dr. Peter Attia

Protein Needs by Population

For Women

Women often undereat protein, partly due to cultural messaging about "bulking up" (spoiler alert: you won't accidentally become a bodybuilder). The same 0.7-1.0 grams per pound guideline applies, but women should pay special attention to getting adequate protein during hormonal fluctuations, pregnancy, and menopause when muscle preservation becomes even more critical.

For Men

Men typically find it easier to hit protein targets due to generally higher caloric needs and less food restriction anxiety. The sweet spot remains 0.7-1.0 grams per pound, with active men gravitating toward the higher end.

For Weight Loss

Here's where protein becomes your secret weapon. Higher protein intake during caloric restriction helps preserve muscle mass while promoting satiety. Aim for the higher end of the range (0.8-1.0 grams per pound) and don't be afraid to calculate based on your goal weight rather than current weight if you have significant weight to lose.

For Older Adults (50+)

This is where the recommendations get interesting. For adults aged 50+, we recommend consuming 1.2 – 1.6 grams of protein/kg of body weight per day (0.54 – 0.72 grams/pound body weight), but many experts suggest going even higher due to age-related muscle loss (sarcopenia) and decreased protein synthesis efficiency.

Protein intake should range between .7 to 1 gram per pound of your bodyweight favoring the upper end when you hit roughly 60 years old (to limit age-related muscle loss called sarcopenia). Your grandmother might need more protein per pound than her 25-year-old grandson.

For Maximum Hypertrophy

If your goal is to build as much muscle as humanly possible, you might benefit from pushing toward the higher end of recommendations. Some research suggests benefits up to 1.3-1.5 grams per pound, though the additional gains beyond 1.0 gram per pound are modest. Unless you're stepping on stage in posing trunks, don't stress about these marginal differences.

Plant-Based Protein: The 30% Rule

If you're following a plant-based diet, you'll need to adjust your targets upward. Plant-based proteins are lower quality and less bioavailable....meaning, less of it is able to be utilized by the body. If you're vegan, vegetarian, or simply trying to make your protein sources plant-based, you'll want to increase your protein goal by about 30 to 40 percent.

This isn't a knock on plant protein....it's just biology. Combine different plant proteins, focus on complete sources like quinoa and soy, and don't be afraid to supplement strategically.

When Does Timing Matter?

While total intake trumps timing, there are a few scenarios where when you eat protein matters:

Morning Protein: muscle protein synthesis decreases overnight. Until you consume about three grams of leucine available in about 30 grams of high quality protein your body will remain in a catabolic state. Translation: Don't skip breakfast protein.

Post-Workout: The "anabolic window" isn't as narrow as once believed getting protein within a few hours of training optimizes recovery and adaptation. Having protein within 1–6 hours (up to 24 hours) after training does seem to slightly improve recovery, muscle protein synthesis, and adaptation especially if you trained fasted or haven’t eaten protein in the past few hours.

Before Bed: Casein protein or a slow-digesting source before sleep can support overnight muscle protein synthesis, though this is more important for serious athletes than weekend warriors.

The Bottom Line: Keep It Simple

The protein landscape doesn't need to be complicated:

• Aim for 0.7-1.0 grams per pound of bodyweight daily

• Older adults should target the higher end or beyond

• Plant-based eaters should add 30-40% to these targets

• Don't stress about perfect timing focus on consistency (get protein in 24 hrs post workout)

• Whole food sources beat supplements when possible

The reality is, natural protein-containing foods have the highest nutrient density of any food out there. If you meet your protein goals particularly using animal proteins, you'll meet 65 percent of your overall vitamin and mineral needs with barely 40 percent of your calories.

Stop overthinking it. A palm-sized portion of protein at each meal, plus a snack or two if needed, will get most people where they need to be. Your body is remarkably adaptable trust it to do what it evolved to do.

The supplement industry wants you to believe protein is complicated because complexity sells products. The truth? It's refreshingly straightforward. Eat adequate protein from quality sources, stay consistent, and let your training do the talking.

Want more evidence-based fitness? Follow along as we separate science from marketing in the world of health and fitness.

References:

1. Phillips SM, Chevalier S, Leidy HJ. Protein “requirements” beyond the RDA: implications for optimizing health. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2016;41(5):565-572. doi:10.1139/apnm-2015-0550

2. Nowson C, O’Connell S. Protein requirements and recommendations for older people: A review. Nutrients. 2015;7(8):6874-6899. doi:10.3390/nu7085311

3. Mandsager K, Harb S, Cremer P, Phelan D, Nissen SE, Jaber W. Association of cardiorespiratory fitness with long-term mortality among adults undergoing exercise treadmill testing. JAMA Netw Open. 2018;1(6):e183605. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.3605

4. Kokkinos P, Faselis C, Samuel IBH, et al. Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Mortality Risk Across the Spectra of Age, Race, and Sex. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;80(6):598-609. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2022.05.031

5. Pfister R, Sharp SJ, Luben R, Khaw KT, Wareham NJ. No evidence of an increased mortality risk associated with low levels of glycated haemoglobin in a non-diabetic UK population. Diabetologia. 2011;54(8):2025-2032. doi:10.1007/s00125-011-2162-0

6. Morton RW, Murphy KT, McKellar SR, et al. A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression of the effect of protein supplementation on resistance training-induced gains in muscle mass and strength in healthy adults. Br J Sports Med. 2018;52(6):376-384. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2017-097608

7. Nunes EA, Colenso-Semple L, McKellar SR, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of protein intake to support muscle mass and function in healthy adults. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2022;13(2):795-810. doi:10.1002/jcsm.12922

8. McKenna CF, Salvador AF, Hughes RL, et al. Higher protein intake during resistance training does not potentiate strength, but modulates gut microbiota, in middle-aged adults: a randomized control trial. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2021;320(5):E900-E913. doi:10.1152/ajpendo.00574.2020

9. French SJ, Kanter M, Maki KC, Rust BM, Allison DB. The harms of high protein intake: conjectured, postulated, claimed, and presumed, but shown? Am J Clin Nutr. 2025;122(1):9-16. doi:10.1016/j.ajcnut.2025.05.002

10. Skov AR, Toubro S, Bülow J, Krabbe K, Parving HH, Astrup A. Changes in renal function during weight loss induced by high vs low-protein low-fat diets in overweight subjects. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1999;23(11):1170-1177. doi:10.1038/sj.ijo.0801048

11. Halbesma N, Bakker SJL, Jansen DF, et al. High protein intake associates with cardiovascular events but not with loss of renal function. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;20(8):1797-1804. doi:10.1681/ASN.2008060649

12. Antonio J, Ellerbroek A, Silver T, et al. A high protein diet has no harmful effects: A one-year crossover study in resistance-trained males. J Nutr Metab. 2016;2016:9104792. doi:10.1155/2016/9104792

13. Hahn D, Hodson EM, Fouque D. Low protein diets for non-diabetic adults with chronic kidney disease. Cochrane Libr. Published online October 4, 2018. doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001892.pub4

14. Fontana L, Cummings NE, Arriola Apelo SI, et al. Decreased consumption of branched-chain amino acids improves metabolic health. Cell Rep. 2016;16(2):520-530. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2016.05.092

15. Ferraz-Bannitz R, Beraldo RA, Peluso AA, et al. Dietary protein restriction improves metabolic dysfunction in patients with metabolic syndrome in a randomized, controlled trial. Nutrients. 2022;14(13):2670. doi:10.3390/nu14132670

16. A Report of the Panel on Macronutrients, Subcommittees on Upper Reference Levels of Nutrients and Interpretation and Uses of Dietary Reference Intakes, Standing Committee on the Scientific Evaluation of Dietary Reference Intakes, et al. Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy, Carbohydrate, Fiber, Fat, Fatty Acids, Cholesterol, Protein, and Amino Acids (macronutrients). National Academies Press; 2005. doi:10.17226/10490

17. Weiler M, Hertzler SR, Dvoretskiy S. Is it time to reconsider the U.s. recommendations for dietary protein and amino acid intake? Nutrients. 2023;15(4). doi:10.3390/nu15040838

18. Wolfe RR, Kim IY, Park S, Ferrando A. Tracing metabolic flux to assess optimal dietary protein and amino acid consumption. Exp Mol Med. 2022;54(9):1323-1331. doi:10.1038/s12276-022-00817